Existing players used to logging in with their character name and moo password must signup for a website account.
- NickRosso 12m
- Vanashis 1m
- BeforeTheWhispers 49s
- BlackSoul 4m
- Terrible_the_duck 9s
- AntiqueBeast 9m
- Rillem 10s Make it personal.
- SmokePotion 26m Right or wrong, I'm getting high.
- Nyx 3s
- Euclid 10s
- zxq 34m Tools: https://ansicolortool.neocities.org
- whatislove 1h reputation is whoever holds a bigger gun
- Crooknose 5h
And 22 more hiding and/or disguised
Connect to Sindome @ moo.sindome.org:5555 or just Play Now

Why do luxury items tank attire score?
Something feels really wrong.

Pretty straightforward question: Why do luxury items lower your attire score?

I haven't found a single one that even keeps attire score at the same level! We're paying to flaunt status, so… why do we lose status? Are luxury items actually super-low class to be seen with?

Rolexes, rings, radbanes...

Are we just not buying expensive-enough ones? What gives?

Get tailored goods.
Tailored luxury items that overlap things like rings are ok? (If using the proper materials.)
I don't believe jewelry materials are released yet. Note that items like rings cover a -single- slot and thus are very low scoring on what catches peoples attention, so you're also seeing those effects.

Keep in mind, its about whats notable, not based on fundamental value.

Johnny,

If that were true, items like rad-banes and rings wouldn't -tank- your attire score, but they do.

Conversely, I have made single slot items that actually accentuate the attire score. It is my belief that there -may- be a mechanical issue worth looking into here.

File a bug. Certainly not a priority.
Luxuries definitely raise the quality of an outfit that determines the shortdesc (sometimes substantially), but there are different qualities to player-made clothing that don't always apply to luxuries which I suspect is why they sometimes seem to add 'lesser' descriptors to the 'overall their clothing is…' line.

Just my experience from testing.