Existing players used to logging in with their character name and moo password must signup for a website account.
- Hivemind 9m
- SmokePotion 20m Right or wrong, I'm getting high.
- zxq 46m Tools: https://ansicolortool.neocities.org
- Rillem 7m Make it personal.
- Raven 5m I lost myself, in the dark charade.
- Errant 4s
- PsycoticCone 3m
a Butako 34s https://i.imgur.com/GsU4a79.jpg
a Mench 2h Doing a bit of everything.
- Wulf 1m
- Pladdicus 2m uh
- Sivartas 3h
- Vanashis 2h
- AntiqueBeast 9m
- whatislove 26m get big
- Euclid 1m
- Yizhi 3h
And 26 more hiding and/or disguised
Sindomedome logo
a cyberpunk roleplaying game
banner art by Grand Failure
Connect to Sindome @ moo.sindome.org:5555 or just Play Now

Briefcases
oh the potential!

Login to post. Membership required.
Jump To
Newest Post
I know that containers got pulled because people were doing what people do, and abusing them horribly. I'm pretty sure I was guilty of it myself, we all just got a little too carried away, and when we started putting out favourite aricraft carriers into boxes, suddenly someone realised we were taking the piss, and for our crimes, we now all have gear scattered over our apartment floors. (well, I do anyway)

To get to my actual idea though..

Briefcases

My idea was that we could have briefcases that are essentially like wallets. You could only put in them the stuff you can put into a wallet, for example, money, business cards, photographs, and unlike wallets, letters too. If a briefcase could hold more money than a wallet, then you could have the fun of people making moviesque deals, where briefcases full of money are exchanged, lost, stolen, all those kinds of fun and games.

I don't think you could really abuse them like other containers were, and it could create some pretty cool RP. Not to mention if a GM wanted to start a plot, leaving a briefcase full of money around and then having whoever found it deal with the consequnces of whatever they choose to do with that is always good for a laugh.

Oh, and it'd be nice if maybe you could lock them or something, too.


okay, I've finished rambling now :)

By King[Fu] at May 25, 2002, 10:28 AM | 0
I second that notion
By Dominik at May 25, 2002, 11:04 AM | 0
Hrm… I like it...
By Wren at May 25, 2002, 11:08 AM | 0
Just let me know if i'm wrong, but for that to work correctly, the container would need a wieght requirement….or a max amount of chyen that can be placed inside.  And isn't that why containers where pulled untill the wieght system can be fixed with them?
By allandra at May 26, 2002, 1:11 PM | 0
What, you mean like wallets do?

By King[Fu] at May 26, 2002, 1:41 PM | 0
All set up and ready to go. Would have been done by now if things hadn't gone to shit.

Basically the old containers were part way through a rework that would only let you put so much weight into a container and only put objects into a container if they were short enough (on the longest side) to fit.

But anyhow, yea. No official comment seems to have been made, so there's my unofficial comment on how things were.

By Rastus at May 26, 2002, 3:04 PM | 0
Jump To Oldest Post