Existing players used to logging in with their character name and moo password must signup for a website account.
- Fogchild1 7s
- SmokePotion 1m Right or wrong, I'm getting high.
- Raven 19m I lost myself, in the dark charade.
- Visitor_Guest 19m [Welcome to Sindome]
- Rillem 2m Make it personal.
- Archangel212168 2m
- Soltan 17m
- freezeway3k 5s
- Woeful 5m
- Sulfurado 39m
- Hivemind 31s
a Mench 57m Doing a bit of everything.
- zxq 4m Tools: https://ansicolortool.neocities.org
- PsycoticCone 11m
- xXShadowSlayerXx 49m
- JanekSembilan 1m
- Pladdicus 2m uh
- Fay 21m
- hex 19s
- Wulf 1m
- Vanashis 3s
- BlackSoul 10m
- FluffyPuff 22m
And 30 more hiding and/or disguised
Connect to Sindome @ moo.sindome.org:5555 or just Play Now

Hacking Minigame for Deckers
A thorough design document

With the help of a friend who isn't in any way invested in Sindome, here is a thorough design document of a hacking minigame for deckers.

You have limited time to get in, cause trouble, find paydata, or strengthen defenses. Get out safely, or risk compromising your identity or getting hurt!

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-8ND9y7dYY1hA-e_EwHVdtr8aAFutFYtYjGUw8Ri51I/edit?usp=drivesdk

The goal is to make an activity for deckers that's easy for staff to build, has real in-game effects that everyone would want, and allows for RP during the activity.

Overview of the hacking minigame

1) Enter the backend through a modded device, leaving your corporeal self behind.

2) Explore the backend.

3) Find item to hack, encrypt, or mark, while avoiding ICE.

4) Hack or encrypt the target, or mark the backend location.

5) Determine success and get your reward, typically disabling electronics or getting paydata.

6) Return to step 2 or exit the minigame.

Check out the design document to learn the specifics!

This looks fun, but it also looks like it'd be sort of difficult to implement.
Baguette is right in the implementing part. Sounds good on paper but I can see some parts that wouldn't matter or make a difference (which I can't really disclose here because it'd be revealing IC info).