Existing players used to logging in with their character name and moo password must signup for a website account.
- Fogchild1 5s
- SmokePotion 51s Right or wrong, I'm getting high.
- Raven 14m I lost myself, in the dark charade.
- Visitor_Guest 15m [Welcome to Sindome]
- Rillem 1m Make it personal.
- Archangel212168 8m
- Soltan 13m
- freezeway3k 5s
- Woeful 1m
- Sulfurado 34m
- Hivemind 8s
a Mench 52m Doing a bit of everything.
- zxq 10s Tools: https://ansicolortool.neocities.org
- PsycoticCone 7m
- xXShadowSlayerXx 44m
- JanekSembilan 54s
- Pladdicus 45s uh
- Fay 17m
- hex 23s
- Wulf 42s
- Vanashis 9m
- BlackSoul 5m
- FluffyPuff 18m
And 30 more hiding and/or disguised
Connect to Sindome @ moo.sindome.org:5555 or just Play Now

QoL: Fix secure codes for e-mem modules
Clumsy fingers shouldn't completely reset your passcode

Today I nearly lost access to my e-memory module because I made a typo in the code when writing 'secure e-note with
' the last time I locked it. It makes no sense to, essentially, set a new passcode every single time you lock your module. I suggest we make the e-memory module secure codes more like locking briefcase codes. You set the code for the module when you first get it, and then all you have to do when you want to lock it is type 'secure e-note'. 

In addition, I'm very confused on how it works with two e-memory modules slotted into your e-note, if each module has a different secure code. Does the code align with the e-note device itself or does it align with each individual e-memory module?

SMH. Reposting.

Today I nearly lost access to my e-memory module because I made a typo in the code when writing 'secure e-note with code' the last time I locked it. It makes no sense to, essentially, set a new passcode every single time you lock your module. I suggest we make the e-memory module secure codes more like locking briefcase codes. You set the code for the module when you first get it, and then all you have to do when you want to lock it is type 'secure e-note'.

In addition, I'm very confused on how it works with two e-memory modules slotted into your e-note, if each module has a different secure code. Does the code align with the e-note device itself or does it align with each individual e-memory module?

I agree you shouldn't have to type the code every time you secure it.
E-memory modules are getting more widespread in the game. I wonder if we need to take a second look at the code for securing e-mems?

The issue I mentioned about having to retype the password every time you secure your e-mem is still a thing. In addition, it seems like if you slot two e-mems into one e-note, you only have to type in one password to unsecure the data on both e-mems, even if the two e-mems were secured with different passcodes.

It's just all very glitchy and not much continuity. Also, and this might be deserving of a different thread – how about possibilities for cracking encrypted e-mems?

I believe higher grade credchips already separate the function of Secure/Unsecure with no extra code entry needed to secure them (only to unsecure them) with a separate syntax to change what the security key is.

Code can probably be lifted from that.