Existing players used to logging in with their character name and moo password must signup for a website account.
- Hivemind 9m
- SmokePotion 20m Right or wrong, I'm getting high.
- zxq 46m Tools: https://ansicolortool.neocities.org
- Rillem 7m Make it personal.
- Raven 5m I lost myself, in the dark charade.
- Errant 4s
- PsycoticCone 3m
a Butako 34s https://i.imgur.com/GsU4a79.jpg
a Mench 2h Doing a bit of everything.
- Wulf 1m
- Pladdicus 2m uh
- Sivartas 3h
- Vanashis 2h
- AntiqueBeast 9m
- whatislove 26m get big
- Euclid 1m
- Yizhi 3h
And 26 more hiding and/or disguised
Connect to Sindome @ moo.sindome.org:5555 or just Play Now

QoL: Fix secure codes for e-mem modules
Clumsy fingers shouldn't completely reset your passcode

Today I nearly lost access to my e-memory module because I made a typo in the code when writing 'secure e-note with
' the last time I locked it. It makes no sense to, essentially, set a new passcode every single time you lock your module. I suggest we make the e-memory module secure codes more like locking briefcase codes. You set the code for the module when you first get it, and then all you have to do when you want to lock it is type 'secure e-note'. 

In addition, I'm very confused on how it works with two e-memory modules slotted into your e-note, if each module has a different secure code. Does the code align with the e-note device itself or does it align with each individual e-memory module?

SMH. Reposting.

Today I nearly lost access to my e-memory module because I made a typo in the code when writing 'secure e-note with code' the last time I locked it. It makes no sense to, essentially, set a new passcode every single time you lock your module. I suggest we make the e-memory module secure codes more like locking briefcase codes. You set the code for the module when you first get it, and then all you have to do when you want to lock it is type 'secure e-note'.

In addition, I'm very confused on how it works with two e-memory modules slotted into your e-note, if each module has a different secure code. Does the code align with the e-note device itself or does it align with each individual e-memory module?

I agree you shouldn't have to type the code every time you secure it.
E-memory modules are getting more widespread in the game. I wonder if we need to take a second look at the code for securing e-mems?

The issue I mentioned about having to retype the password every time you secure your e-mem is still a thing. In addition, it seems like if you slot two e-mems into one e-note, you only have to type in one password to unsecure the data on both e-mems, even if the two e-mems were secured with different passcodes.

It's just all very glitchy and not much continuity. Also, and this might be deserving of a different thread – how about possibilities for cracking encrypted e-mems?

I believe higher grade credchips already separate the function of Secure/Unsecure with no extra code entry needed to secure them (only to unsecure them) with a separate syntax to change what the security key is.

Code can probably be lifted from that.