Existing players used to logging in with their character name and moo password must signup for a website account.
- Fogchild1 1m
- SmokePotion 2m Right or wrong, I'm getting high.
- Raven 16m I lost myself, in the dark charade.
- Visitor_Guest 16m [Welcome to Sindome]
- Rillem 3m Make it personal.
- Archangel212168 0s
- Soltan 14m
- freezeway3k 7s
- Woeful 2m
- Sulfurado 36m
- Hivemind 13s
a Mench 54m Doing a bit of everything.
- zxq 1m Tools: https://ansicolortool.neocities.org
- PsycoticCone 8m
- xXShadowSlayerXx 46m
- JanekSembilan 13s
- Pladdicus 31s uh
- Fay 18m
- hex 17s
- Wulf 1m
- Vanashis 1m
- BlackSoul 7m
- FluffyPuff 19m
And 30 more hiding and/or disguised
Sindomedome logo
a cyberpunk roleplaying game
banner art by Grand Failure
Connect to Sindome @ moo.sindome.org:5555 or just Play Now
  • BgBB
  • Ideas
  • stop
  • stop all automated actions with one command!

stop
stop all automated actions with one command!

Login to post. Membership required.
Jump To
Newest Post
Currently there's a whole slew of sub-commands to 'stop', including 'stop w' to stop walking (how come no 'stop a' to stop attacking?), but…

I would love to see 'stop' useable to simply stop all automated actions your character is doing, sort of a hard breaker to completely return manual control, or a way for newer players like myself to not spend thirty seconds trying to remember how to stop fighting (was it 'stop fight'? No..."Stop attack'? nope...uhm...'stop fighting'? nope....) in the middle of the spam inherent in automated fights.

By RedSteelButterfly at Aug 12, 2019, 3:31 PM | 0
+1
By JMo at Aug 12, 2019, 3:31 PM | 0
this is a good idea. if not stop then some other short one word command that makes me stop everything. Even stop all would be fine.
By Vera at Aug 12, 2019, 4:13 PM | 0
I agree.

At least a 'stop at' to stop attacking. And a corresponding 'stop ai' to stop aiming.

Is it too code / CPU intensive to do a partial string search?

By Hek at Aug 12, 2019, 4:48 PM | 0
While I agree that 'stop' to stop all actions would be amazing (+1 to this) 'stop att' already exists to stop attacking - Since some people are suggesting this. I don't think it's widely known (but it is listed on the helpfile).
By Kyrius00 at Aug 12, 2019, 4:50 PM | 0
Stop by itself stopping everything is a good idea plus one'd.
By kroack at Aug 12, 2019, 5:15 PM | 0
+10000 pleeeeease
By ynk at Aug 12, 2019, 5:17 PM | 0
Before this is implemented, you can work around this by making a ~stop macro that just stops everything (or just attack, if that's your thing)
By wiebman at Aug 12, 2019, 5:17 PM | 0
They've said that spammy macro's like that aren't allowed to me in the past..
By RheaGhe at Aug 12, 2019, 5:18 PM | 0
I would love for stop alone, by default, to just stop everything, and then possibly get granular with arguments.
By Marleen at Aug 13, 2019, 10:40 AM | 0
Bump because I still like this idea.
By kroack at Oct 2, 2019, 7:26 PM | 0
@Hek.

IIRC you can type 'stop att' to stop attacking now.

By Necronex666 at Oct 2, 2019, 8:11 PM | 0
Jump To Oldest Post