Existing players used to logging in with their character name and moo password must signup for a website account.
- Hivemind 43s
- SmokePotion 21m Right or wrong, I'm getting high.
- zxq 47m Tools: https://ansicolortool.neocities.org
- Rillem 9m Make it personal.
- Raven 7m I lost myself, in the dark charade.
- Errant 4s
- PsycoticCone 5m
a Butako 2m https://i.imgur.com/GsU4a79.jpg
a Mench 2h Doing a bit of everything.
- Wulf 2m
- Pladdicus 28s uh
- Vanashis 2h
- AntiqueBeast 11m
- whatislove 28m get big
- Euclid 2m
- Yizhi 3h
And 26 more hiding and/or disguised
Connect to Sindome @ moo.sindome.org:5555 or just Play Now

The Great Chic Debate
Conflict between Attractiveness & Clothing scores

Continuing from https://www.sindome.org/bgbb/game-discussion/new-game-features/substance-from-yo-style–scoring-attire-320/#last

Background: Chic+ clothing score covers up attractiveness adjective, which causes conflicting goals of Charisma investment vs. Clothing Score investment.

Idea: What if the cover-up scaled per clothing level?

For example…

Well-dressed: Hides Good-looking adjective only.

Chic: Hides Attractive & Good-looking.

Whatever's 1 above Chic: Hides Winsome, Attractive & Good-looking

etc.

This way, your clothing score has to meet a threshold for disguising purposes, plus people who have invested UE into Charisma don't see their outward investment disappeared.

You are making assumptions about how these descriptors are arrayed in relation to each other that aren't necessarily true. Different characters also have different ability to tell things about clothing, so you may be short information.
What do you propose then?