Existing players used to logging in with their character name and moo password must signup for a website account.
- adrognik 2m
- Mikael 4s No @invis-wow set
- Fogchild1 1m
- SmokePotion 1m Right or wrong, I'm getting high.
- Raven 32m I lost myself, in the dark charade.
- Rillem 12m Make it personal.
- Archangel212168 4s
- Soltan 31m
- freezeway3k 16s
- Woeful 19m
- Sulfurado 52m
- Hivemind 31s
a Mench 1h Doing a bit of everything.
- zxq 5m Tools: https://ansicolortool.neocities.org
- PsycoticCone 25m
- JanekSembilan 6s
- Pladdicus 1m uh
- Fay 35m
- hex 2m
- Wulf 1m
- Vanashis 50s
- BlackSoul 10m
- FluffyPuff 36m
And 30 more hiding and/or disguised
Connect to Sindome @ moo.sindome.org:5555 or just Play Now

1st Neuralink Human Participant
There is no spoon

Noland Arbaugh is the first human to have a Neuralink device implanted in his brain. He talks about his experience in this podcast.

https://youtu.be/Kbk9BiPhm7o?si=uIE5Dx6OVOLQqifv&t=24539

I went to a pretty interesting talk a while ago on the topic of brain interfaces and ethics surrounding brain data, and while it was recorded I unfortunately haven't been able to figure out where or if it was actually posted online… however I did find a talk by one of the same speakers (Prof. Jennifer Chandler), hosted a few years ago that covered similar ethics topics and also some pretty relevant (to our themes about cloning and mind capture and death) discussion about death determination.

Ethical & Legal Issues with the Brain-Based Definition of Death from an Organ Donation Perspective. Jennifer Chandler, Faculty of Law – Common Law Section, University of Ottawa & Christy Simpson, Department of Bioethics, Dalhousie University & Canadian Blood Services.

And I find it 30 seconds after posting that.

The Law and Ethics of Reading the Mind from Brain Data.

Musk’s Neuralink recently announced a trial of its implanted brain-computer interface (BCI) will start soon in Toronto. BCIs and other devices that monitor and decode brain activity offer promising possibilities for people with severe motor disabilities, including people unable to communicate. This is not all that is now being done with the interpretation of brain activity data – in some places, this data is being used in criminal investigations to identify guilty knowledge.

A host of questions are now arising about the nature of the link between brain activity data and mental states, and whether privacy laws and concepts are up to the task of a future in which we access the mind in this new way.